Master Slave Husband Wife is an inspiring story about two courageous people who exhibit extraordinary spirit and thirst for freedom. But it is also a remarkable lesson about more common examples of ignorance and prejudice that treat freedom as a privilege instead of a birthright. As the book’s title indicates, American society in the middle of the 19th century had a hierarchical structure that recognized enormous differences in status between people with different roles and especially skin color. What Ilyon Woo’s rendition of the Crafts’ story so skillfully highlights is how two illiterate slaves managed to turn that prejudice to their strategic advantage. Ellen’s light skin and a costume that allowed her to pose as a (male) slave owner were her ticket to safe travel on trains and ships and across the Mason-Dixon line – a journey that would have been impossible, otherwise.
She and William earned safe passage not just in looking the part in the South. They continued to face challenges in the supposedly safe North, where many people lent their support largely because the couple were deemed “intelligent” and thus worthy of freedom. In Worcester, MA, we are told, a pastor rallied the crowd to Ellen’s aid not because they were committed to freedom for all, but because she “may be called beautiful; she has no trace of African blood discernible in her features, eyes, cheeks, nose, or hair.” Black people were not treated as equals in any state, and thanks to the Fugitive Slave Law (FSL) of 1850, which gave slave owners authority to pursue runaways into free states, “the Crafts remained outlaws, even up North.” Daniel Webster, one of the era’s most influential figures and Secretary of State during the Fillmore Administration, demanded arrest of the Crafts. And Benjamin Curtis, who would soon join the Supreme Court, considered fugitives invaders who were guilty of disturbing the peace in Massachusetts.
Although I was surprised to learn the extent of the prejudice and dehumanizing treatment of slaves in the North, I enjoyed reading about the civil disobedience of the FSL that helped the Crafts escape to Canada and England. Their fame, largely a function of Ellen’s relative “whiteness” and the clever ruse that earned the respect of many abolitionists, led to public demonstrations of support that frustrated politicians and inspired slaves in the South. The FSL made it a crime to assist fugitives and a duty to hunt them down, yet organized resistance emerged, such as the Colored Citizens and the Vigilance Committee in Boston. These groups recruited local Sheriffs to protect the Crafts by charging the slave hunters from Macon, GA with slander, criminal intent, and kidnapping, and setting their bails extremely high. Thousands of people, white and black, gathered to demand punishment of the slave hunters. The mob tossed garbage at them, they were mocked as uneducated bottom dwellers, and they returned to Georgia empty-handed.
We know now that the FSL and the Compromise failed to avert civil war, and while the war settled the legal issue of slavery, it did nothing to change racist attitudes. It took us a hundred years to legally recognize equal rights for Black Americans, and almost 80 years after that, Black Americans are still struggling to realize those rights. It’s hard to celebrate such a gradual, reluctant abandonment of ideas that are so completely immoral and inhumane. And I can’t help wondering how much of that is not due to universal acceptance of equality but because interracial relationships are more common and have given us far more people who look like Ellen. As good as we might feel about her success story, we all know that it could never have happened if more of her African blood had been “discernible.”
Steve Richardson is a founding member of the Virginia Independent Voters Association. Steve was a member of the Eyes on 2020 National Cabinet.


















